cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword" : 3 Documents clear
Upaya Pembuktian Oditur Militer dan Pertimbangan Hakim Memutus Tindak Pidana Desersi dalam Waktu Damai dengan Pemberatan Bisma Cahya Raditya
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30042

Abstract

     This research examines the issues regarding what the attempts to verify the Military Oditur against the crime of desertion in peacetime with a denunciation have used valid evidences pursuant to Article 172 of the Military Justice Act and whether the considerations of the Military Court Judge decide upon the desertion in peace with the objections are in accordance with Article 171 jo Article 190 Military Justice Law jo Article 26 of the Military Criminal Code. This research is the normative legal research that is both prescriptive and applied. The approach is used that is the approach the case. Type and source material primary law is law and secondary law materials obtained by means of the study of librarianship. Legal materials analysis techniques with the method of deductive syllogisms that connects the major premise and minor premise further drawn the conclusion.     The results derived from this study on the suitability of the verifcation of the Military Oditur against the desertion in peace with the objections of using the lawful evidence according to Article 172 of the Military Justice Act. Legal evidence is the testimony of witnesses, expert information, defendant’s statements, letters, and instructions. And the consideration of the Judge of the Military Tribunal to decide the crime of desertion in peace with the objections has been in accordance with Article 171 jo Article 190 of the Military Justice Law jo Article 26 of the Military Criminal Code by stating that the Defendant is proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a crime of desertion in peace with a denunciation and imprisonment for 10 months and was dismissed from military service.Keywords: Proof, Military Oditur, Judge Consideration, Crime Desertion In Peaceful Time With Obstacles
Pertimbangan Hukum Mahkamah Agung Memutus Perkara Penipuan Secara Berlanjut dan Pencucian Uang Achmad Mirza Fahlevi
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30032

Abstract

     This study aims to determine the consideration of the Supreme Court adjudicating the Cassation appeal to the case of continuous fraud and money laundering. The research method used is normative legal research. The approach used is the approach of law and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. It is known that the Supreme Court’s consideration granted the Cassation appeal to the case of continuous fraud and money laundering with Defendant Masjaya bin Nurdin proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act “Continuous Fraud and Money Laundering” and imposing a penalty on the Defendant therefore by criminal imprisonment for 8 (eight) years and a fne of Rp. 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah), provided that if the fne is not paid, the Defendant shall be subject to a fve-month imprisonment based on the error of judex facti considering the element of deceit or lies from the actions of the Defendant, CV business. GDC from Makassar RegionalGovernment is to trade herbal medicine, but in fact CV. GDC does not do herbal medicine, but collects funds from the community. therefore, the balance of the Supreme Court is in conformity with the provisions contained in Article 256 jo of Article 193 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Keywords: Judge Consideration, Money Laundering Crime, Crime Fraud.
Tinjauan Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana Pokok dan Tambahan Dalam Perkara Melanggar Kesusilaan di Depan Orang Lain Pindo Asmara Tungga Deva
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30064

Abstract

      This research examines the issues regarding the reason of application for Cassation against the Military ignored his judge advocate elements in the allegations in the trial in the case violated decency and reviewing about consideration Judex Juris grant petition for cassation and your imprisonment and dismissal from military service. This research is the normative legal research is both prescriptive and applied. The source of the legal materials obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Case study into approaches to the writing of this law.Legal materials collection techniques in this research is the study of the literature. Legal material obtained is then processed using the method of deductive syllogisms. In this study, has been known to excuse the military judge advocate submits Remedy of Cassation on the basis of careful not Factie Judex in considering the elements that allegations the trial that resulted in the main Military Court judges had been wrong in applying the law in an award has freed the defendant of all charges of the military judge advocate in criminal acts of Decency in accordance with condition of article 239 paragraph (1) letter a Act No. 31 of the year 1997 concerning Military Justice explain what a true rule of law is not applied or not applied as it should be. As well as suitability Considerations Judex Juris grant reason of Cassation judge advocate of the military, the military High Court ruling cancelling, and judge themselves by stating that based on considerations of the above Supreme Court the defendant is argues has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing criminal acts as didakwakan by a military judge advocate in the impeachment Article 281 paragraph (2) the book of the law of criminal law Criminal Code (KUHP) saying that anyone who deliberately and in front of other people who are there are there contrary to his will, breaking decency.Keywords: Cassation, elements in the indictmen, Criminal act of Decency

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 11, No 4 (2023) Vol 11, No 3: 2023 Vol 11, No 2: 2023 Vol 11, No 1: JANUARI - APRIL 2023 Vol 11, No 1: 2023 Vol 10, No 4: 2022 Vol 10, No 3: 2022 Vol 10, No 2: 2022 Vol 10, No 1: 2022 Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI - APRIL Vol 9, No 4: 2021 Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 3: 2021 Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 2: 2021 Vol 9, No 1: 2021 Vol 9, No 2: MEI - AGUTUS Vol 8, No 3 (2020): DESEMBER JURNAL VERSTEK VOL. 8 NO. 3 ( SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER 2020 ) Vol 8, No 2 (2020): AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol 8, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1 (2019): APRIL Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword Vol 7, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018): AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue